In nature, animals often lack the privilege of selecting their food like humans do. Their preference for a specific type of food usually takes a back seat to the mere fact of survival. The rule for wild animals is fairly simple: if it’s in front of you and you can tolerate it, animals will go ahead and eat it.
The presence of taste buds essentially allows wild animals to determine whether a specific food source is good or bad for them to eat. This, in essence, is the key to survival. These animals’ taste buds will be able to detect harmful substances, and therefore animals will opt to avoid these specific harmful foods. It’s of utmost importance that animals can differentiate between good and bad when it comes to the toxicity of food.
Take, for instance, the Xinkhova Female hoisting an Impala lamb into a tree to get it out of the grasp of any scavengers. Witnessing a hyena devouring carrion that’s been lying around for a week, especially when we experience the scent of that decomposing flesh, is certainly enough to make one nauseous. However, in the wilderness, it might seem that, for the most part, animals are not very selective about what they eat. Contrary to this impression, a closer look at the animal’s lifestyle, diet, and tongue structure is essential to understanding how different creatures perceive taste, and why, for example, hyenas can consume a week-old carcass without any signs of discomfort, even when it has been exposed to the scorching summer heat.
Starting with carnivores makes sense, given that many of the things they consume might be unappetizing to us. However, when you analyze their tongues, a noticeable difference emerges in the density of their taste buds compared to us as humans. On average, humans have around 10,000 taste buds, while most carnivores have far fewer, being around 470 to be exact.
Examining their taste preferences, carnivores are responsive to bitter flavours but cannot taste sweetness. This absence of sensitivity to sweet tastes is attributed to the fact that sugars are not part of their diet, making it rather unnecessary for them to detect those tastes. Bitterness, on the other hand, holds significance for carnivores as it can distinguish between meat that is spoiled and meat that is still safe to consume. The definition of spoiled meat varies slightly for a male lion compared to a human and even more so if we factor in hyenas. This distinction is tied to the carnivore’s digestive system. Their digestive system is far better at processing meats and can tolerate bacteria that would cause immediate and severe stomach issues in humans. This higher tolerance enables carnivores to consume meats that humans would certainly consider inedible.
To briefly touch on herbivores as well, they have far more taste buds than humans and almost double in most cases. Much like carnivores, herbivores don’t have a massive variety when it comes to their food source, so why do they have more taste receptors than humans?
Their extensive taste bud count becomes crucial in distinguishing the bitter tastes of potentially harmful plants hidden among safe vegetation, especially when they are not meticulously inspecting their food sources. Sensitivity to toxins is paramount, given the prevalence of chemical defences in the plant world.
The need for animals to eat is the key to survival in the wild. Carnivores need to be able to pick up bitter tastes to detect whether meat has been spoiled (but one simply cannot liken it to the decision we as humans would make about the same piece of meat). For herbivores, they must be able to detect the myriad of chemical defenses that plant life offers and therefore very crucial that they have more taste buds than us as humans.
Therefore, the intricate interplay between taste buds, dietary preferences, and survival strategies among wild animals underscores the remarkable adaptability of nature. While we may find some of their dietary choices unappetizing, understanding the role of taste buds provides valuable insights into the challenges and solutions animals face in their quest for sustenance in the wild.
Intriguing post, Ross. And the muddy faced hyena photo is superb.
What amazing pcitrures. Thank you for sharing. I love the lion with it’s tongue out.
Absolutely fascinating article! Especially the number of taste buds. Nature is so incredible in how it discerns.
Fascinating blog with lots of new, interesting information.
Enhancing my education with your information about taste is appreciated. Thanks for helping me to grow and learn more about the natural world we live in. Thanks Ross.
Thanks for the very interesting blog, Ross.
Ross, Thanks for a great educational piece on taste. We have always wondered about taste in wildlife and you did a great job of explaining it!
Hi, this leads to the speculation about animals cleverness as well as other multiple factors. If herbivores have got so many taste receptors they also have many different nervous cells. Many axons and synapsis are a bonus. Birds have small brains, but the many neuronal connections make them very clever. Buffaloes are known for their refined behavioural techniques and there are many studies on the go about giraffes. The theory that the pure meat eaters are more intelligent is becoming obsolete. Wonderful pictures of giraffe and buffalo, perfect for TWIP
Wow, completely fascinating Ross!!
Fascinating insights, Ross. Humans have decent sense of taste, although I gather our sense of sight (like some other primates) is exceptional in terms of the range of hues and colours we can see. That allows humans and baboons alike to identify ripe plants, fruits and the like. And interesting carnivores can’t taste sweetness! Makes sense …
Thank you Ross for explaining the dietary preferences and tastes buds with carnivores and herbivores. My goodness the hyenas have definitely got a strong stomach to be able to eat meat that is a week old and been in the scoring sun. Just look at the tongue of the male lion, I see they always lick the meat as well with that rough tongue. It is absolutely amazing how the herbivores detect the myriad chemicals and the carnivores can detect the meat if it is spoiled or good to eat.
Thanks for this interesting post Ross. It’s so true that as humans, off-putting smells of food usually indicate that whatever the offering is, should not be consumed. It seems that for hyenas, jackals, vultures, etc, the smell is not offensive at all and I’m curious about whether a big cat will bypass a days old carcass with plenty of meat left if the odor is too strong, and not even try to taste it. It is fascinating that the herbivores can eat their way through tree and bushes and successfully avoid the leaves that would be poisonous for them. There’s always something to learn….
Thanks Ross for a really interesting blog. Mentioning hyenas, and their very robust digestion, reminds me of a viewing I had in Marthly a couple of years ago. An adolescent elephant carcass (assumed to have died from natural causes) had been there for several days, and we could smell it before we saw it. 2 hyenas disappeared right into the cavity to feed, while numerous vultures scrapped outside. When the hyenas emerged they looked around then shot off at speed. The reason why they fled was obvious soon afterwards, when we saw the 2 Plains Camp males arriving!
The way we’ve all evolved makes perfect sense when factors of digestion, food type and availability is explained. I’m glad nature has created this system so we have clean-up crews such as hyenas and vultures to mitigate disease. I’ve read that in humans, the sweet taste is an indication of food “safety.” Similar to herbivores, a sweet tasting plant, fruit or berry lets us know it’s not poisonous. I’m not volunteering to taste test random plants in the wild though. 😉
So interesting!!! Thank you for that insight.